Skip to content

Training your Italian subsidiary: in Italian, in English, or both?

We need to train our people in Italy: which language, and what changes compared with the rollout we ran at home?

short answer

Train in Italian and keep the shared material in your group language, unless the team genuinely works in English all day. The content stays the same; what changes is that the training arrives from headquarters, so the first half hour decides whether the room is with you.

Which language do you train in?

Ask the people who will be in the room, not the country manager and not HR at headquarters. The question is simple: would you rather do the exercises on your own documents in Italian or in English?

In most Italian subsidiaries the answer is Italian for the session and English for the material, and that combination works well. People think and argue in their own language, and the artefacts stay comparable with the rest of the group.

Full English is the right call when the team reads and writes English all day, which is common in engineering, IT and export sales. Even there, watch the first exercise: if the room goes quiet when it is time to try something on their own files, the language is taking up the attention that should go to the work.

Running everything in English because it is easier to administer will cost you in adoption, and the cost shows up three months later, where nobody connects it to the language.

What the local team hears when training arrives from headquarters

Training decided abroad arrives with a question attached: why now, and what is this really about. If the group has been through a reorganisation, or the tool was chosen without them, the question is louder.

So the first half hour goes into finding out what they have already tried, what they use unofficially, and what they think is going to happen. It has to be done without turning into an inquiry, or nobody will say anything and the session runs blind.

What comes out of it is useful to you as well as to the trainer. If half the office already drafts email with a personal tool on their phone, you have both an adoption signal and a security question, and you learned it in a training room rather than in an audit.

The practical move: have the local manager open the session with two honest sentences about why the company is doing this, then leave the room. Staying changes what people say.

What has to be local, and what stays global

Keep global: the objective, the tools, the usage policy and the way you measure. These are what make a group a group, and letting each country invent its own creates work you will have to undo.

Make local: the examples, the documents used in the exercises, the workflows you start from, and the pace. The Italian entity may have a different customer mix, a different approval chain and a local system nobody at headquarters has seen.

The usage policy deserves a note. A group policy written elsewhere usually answers the question «what may we put into these tools» in general terms. The Italian team will ask it about a specific customer contract, on a specific Tuesday. Someone local has to be able to answer, or people will decide on their own.

If your group has works council or union representation in Italy, involve them before the rollout rather than after. Anything that touches how people work is easier when it has been explained early.

Can Italian funded schemes pay for it?

Often yes. Italian companies pay contributions that build up in an interprofessional fund, and that money can come back as training. Your Italian entity may already be enrolled in one without anyone at headquarters knowing, and the local payroll consultant can tell you in a day.

What is usually covered is the delivery and the design that sits inside the approved plan. Follow-up coaching can be covered too, if the plan includes it as coaching from the start. What sits outside is work that is not training, such as configuring a workspace.

The rules that come with the money are strict, and they surprise international teams: hours kept to the minute, attendance registers signed each session, and a training mode written into the plan that does not change. At Fondimpresa a classroom day can still run on site or live online, confirmed by the day before. The plan is reviewed before it runs, normally within 30 days, so expect weeks of lead time; a company can start right after submitting it, but at its own risk, because if the plan is rejected the company pays for everything. Other funds may set different rules.

Decide early, because it changes the calendar more than the budget. A rollout that has to start next month is one you either pay for yourself or start at your own risk before the plan is approved.

Sources: Italian Law 388/2000, art. 118: interprofessional funds are financed by the training contribution employers already pay, sent to the fund the employer chooses (Normattiva) ↗ (read on 11/10/2026) · Italian Ministry of Labour, list of the national interprofessional funds with their INPS membership codes ↗ (read on 11/10/2026) · Fondimpresa, management and reporting guide for company training plans (Conto Formazione): eligible costs, attendance registers, coaching among the admitted training modes, on site or live online confirmed for each day by the day before, plan review normally within 30 days, early start at the company’s risk (pp. 15, 26-29) ↗ (read on 11/10/2026)

Who do you start with in a subsidiary?

Start with the local managers when they have to carry the change to their teams, because a manager who does not know what to ask for blocks the team without noticing, and because the local reading of the policy has to be theirs.

Start with a mixed group of daily users when the goal is the workflows, two or three people per function, the ones colleagues already ask for help.

Avoid the shape that looks efficient and is not: train one department, usually the one closest to headquarters, and stop. Three months later that function works in a new way, everyone else does not, and every handover between them turns into a negotiation.

In a subsidiary there is one more role worth including from the start: whoever talks to the group about local systems. They will be the person answering the questions the trainer cannot.

What to ask a trainer in Italy before you book

Six questions, and the answers tell you more than a CV.

▸ Which languages they can teach in, not only speak, and whether the material can be in a different language from the session.

▸ Delivery formats: on site, virtual classroom, how they split the hours, and how far they travel.

▸ Time zone and the hours they can hold a virtual room, if your teams span countries.

▸ Who writes the material, whether it can be built on your documents, and who keeps the files afterwards.

▸ Whether they have delivered inside Italian funded schemes, which is a question about discipline with registers and hours rather than about teaching.

▸ What participants will hold at the end. If the answer is «the slides», keep looking.

I work in English and in Italian, in the room and remotely, and my profile answers those six in one page, because that is the page that decides whether a conversation goes further.

Frequently asked questions

Italian, English, or both?
Delivery in Italian with the material in your group language works in most Italian subsidiaries. Full English only where the team already works in English every day, and check with the participants rather than with headquarters.
Can an Italian funded scheme pay for it?
Often yes, through the interprofessional fund your Italian entity already contributes to. It brings strict rules on hours, registers and the training mode, and a plan reviewed before it runs: weeks of lead time, unless you start early at your own risk.
Who do we start with?
Local managers if they have to carry the change, a mixed group of daily users if the goal is the workflows. Training one isolated department and stopping there creates more friction than it removes.

Languages, formats, how I build material on a company’s own documents and how I work with funded schemes are in the trainer profile.

The trainer profile

One PDF with what a decision-maker needs: courses, languages, formats, how I work, the criteria for choosing, the numbers. Plus a sample 16-hour Microsoft Copilot programme.

  • the courses I can deliver right away, by area, with durations
  • languages, locations, formats
  • how I run a session and what participants keep
  • the criteria for choosing an external instructor
  • the numbers, with their basis
  • a sample programme: Microsoft Copilot, 16 hours

The PDF arrives by email; I use the phone number only if you ask me to call. No newsletter: three messages at most, then it’s up to you.